NWSGI 3.0 Plans

It looks like it's just about time for another major release of NWSGI - the last two Decembers have had major releases, and I see no need to break the trend this year. There are going to be a few major changes this time around, so if anyone has any objections, let me know as soon as possible.

Most importantly, it will only support IronPython 2.7 and thus will require .NET 4.0. Like the IronPython team, I'm not going out of my way to break compatibility with .NET 2.0 (or IronPython 2.6, for that matter), but I won't be distributing anything but IronPython 2.7/.NET 4.0 binaries.

Similarly, I will not be supporting IIS 6 (Windows Server 2003) anymore. Again, I won't go out of my way to break it, but I won't be testing against it either. This means I can get rid of the wildcard handling for good, since IIS 7 has a good URL rewriter available.

The biggest change is that I am decoupling the WSGI processing from the ASP.NET pipeline. All of the functionality is currently part of an IHttpHandler implementation, which restricts it to be used with IIS (and Cassini) only. NWSGI 3.0, on the other hand, will allow NWSGI to be used with HttpListener or other servers such as Kayak by moving all WSGI processing into a separate class with no ASP.NET dependencies. The redesign will also allow me to improve the test coverage from zero to, well, something.

Finally, the licence will change to the Apache Licence 2.0 to match IronPython. The basic terms are identical to the Ms-PL licence that was used previously; the Apache licence is just more explicit and also more widely used.

As with the previous versions, I expect to release the final version shortly after IronPython 2.7 is released.

The fate of IronPython?

It appears that Microsoft will not continue to fund IronRuby. Hopefully it will continue to flourish as a community project; I wish them luck. This does raise the question of whether IronPython will meet the same "fate"; in the absence of word from the IronPython team (it is the weekend, after all), I think I'll indulge in some wild speculation.

Mr. Schementi's last day at MS was July 23, meaning he probably gave his two weeks' notice an July 9. Thus, the writing was on the wall by the and of June/beginning of July. That's my rough timeline. But, something doesn't fit.

On July 1, Enthought announced that they would be porting NumPy and SciPy to IronPython and .NET. I would imagine that they would have gotten some assurance from Microsoft that the IronPython project would continue. Or, they've gotten shafted - it happens.

My hypothesis - that IronPython will continue to be funded, for now. The team has said that there are/were potential customers within Microsoft (the Dynamics team was one, I believe), which is critical for continued support. However, I believe there may be one other unexpected saviour - the Windows High-Performance Computing (HPC) team.

Python is the scripting language of choice in the HPC community, largely because of the NumPy/SciPy libraries mentioned earlier. I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft was making a push to get Windows and .NET deeper into that space (it's small but profitable), and IronPython with NumPY/SciPy support could be a key part of that play.

Also, both teams had releases on July 16th – IronRuby 1.1 and IronPython 2.7 Alpha 1. I think that Alpha is an important signal of the team's expectations.

This is what happens when I have insomnia. Hopefully this will still make sense in the morning.